|
In English there are "strong" and
"weak" verb forms: for example, "go, went, gone" (strong)
and "learn, learned, learned" (weak). Similarly, in Greek some verbs
appear in the past tense as "strong" verbs (second aorist), while
others appear as "weak" (first aorist). This will become more apparent
once both forms of the aorist have been introduced. Inititally it should be
pointed out that both first and second aorist verbs function in exactly
the same way, although they are formed differently.
The aorist is a secondary tense like the
imperfect, and is therefore built upon secondary
suffixes.
| Secondary
Active Suffixes |
| |
Singular |
Plural |
| 1 |
-n |
-men |
| 2 |
-j |
-te |
| 3 |
none (or n) |
-n
(or -san) |
Also like the imperfect, the aorist has the past time morpheme
or epsilon augment and therefore expresses action that as past tense.
The aorist is distinguished from the imperfect in
that it expresses simple past action (aoristic aspect), whereas the imperfect
expresses progressive action (imperfective aspect). The basic usage of the
aorist tense needs to be carefully observed, since it has been woefully
misunderstood in the past. It has been described as having a snapshot or
punctiliar kind of action, and for this reason has even been called the
"lightning" tense. However, aorist verbs do not inherently portray
action that happened in an instant; rather, as A.T. Robertson explains, the
aorist "just treats the act as a single whole entirely irrespective
of the parts or time involved" (Historical Research, 832). So in
John 2:20 an aorist verb is used in speaking of how the temple "was
built" in forty-six years. The action of the aorist verb is unitary
or undefined (as its name denotes: "aorist" means "not
determined" or "undefined").
Finally, we might say that among the Greek tenses
the aorist is "the fairest of them all" (the word "aorist"
rhymes with "fairest"). Or, as someone once said, Greek is an
"aorist-loving language." When speaking of actions in the past tense,
the Greeks preferred to use the unmarked, aoristic aspect expressed by the
aorist tense. In this way they could speak in general terms about the past. This
is why when verbs in other tenses appear, we should take note of how they
function in stark relief against this aoristic "background."
|